Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International SOS (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 19:46, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

International SOS
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A quick Google News Archive search only returns press releases. All the sources are either to the company website, bylines written by company execs, broken links or brief mentions. CorporateM (Talk) 02:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, a major company, world leading in international medical evacuations. However, the name is bit difficult to google as get up a lot of non-relevant stuff, dealing with "SOS" as a concept. --Soman (talk) 14:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep plenty of evidence of notability, easily found if you search for the company name in quotation marks. For example, this story about Duke University's reliance on their advice, GWU's use of the service, this interview in Conde Nast - and all of these are in the past week or so! -- Scray (talk) 03:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.