Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Society for the Study of Individual Differences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:26, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

International Society for the Study of Individual Differences

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This academic society does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:ORGCRIT, or any other notability guideline. Indeed, I have not been able to find any WP:SECONDARY coverage that discusses it in any depth. Coverage appears to be limited to glancing mentions in marginal sources like these:. A "relies excessively on references to primary sources" tag has been present on the page since 2008, with no attempt to address the issue since then. My attention was drawn to this article by recent apparent COI editing. Generalrelative (talk) 17:26, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Generalrelative (talk) 17:31, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Generalrelative (talk) 17:32, 6 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.