Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Sound Communication


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 01:09, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

International Sound Communication

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Expired PROD that was contested post-deletion. Reason for the PROD was: "Obscure tape sharing project from the 1980s. The only reference I could find online was an archive of the same project by its same compiler. It was a noble venture, however Wikipedia is not a directory, it's supposed to be an encyclopedia. The reason it has no references in the last 10 years is self-evident." -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 21:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:43, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:44, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Comment: This entry does shine some sort of light on quite an important aspect of modern history, one which *arguably* (by one interpretation of Wikipedia's role, not by all interpretations I'll grant you) deserves to be here every bit as much as, say, the less notable mainstream hits of the era which have articles, and which is increasingly assessed by serious historians; I suspect there *are* reliable sources, just not ones which can be easily tracked down as, say, a Daily Express editorial from the same period, and that's the problem. RobinCarmody (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  19:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.