Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Space Agency (ISA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty ☀ 02:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

International Space Agency (ISA)
Delete Inherently WP:POV article that is original research. Prod tag was deleted without comment. Gw e rnol 20:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't think it's inherently POV but it is clearly OR.  This organization appears to be entirely nonnotable, and the major contributor to the article (User:Isa trademark) has inserted text that says the only valid source for information on ISA is the ISA website itself (due to "misinformation" from other sources).  Has all the hallmarks of a promotional article for an obscure organization.  Note that this article should not be confused with the International Space Agency article.  Powers 21:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

''Now also adding International Space Plane Program to the nomination. Sandstein 21:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)'' And now removing it again, it has its own AfD already, but the author keeps deleting the AfD tag. Sandstein 21:12, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both , obvious non-notable crankery / basement space agency and their fantasy spaceplane programme. Just read their "Public Notice" in the article... Sandstein 21:06, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete We are legitimate. The ISA does exist but the whole thing is written WP:NOT. Lsjzl 21:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Artw 21:11, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, violates many wikipedia policies, including WP:OWN and the copyright notices of wikipedia (GFDL). -- Kim van der Linde at venus 21:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I ahev removed their notice as that is in violation with wikipedia copyright. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. &mdash; Arthur Rubin | (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete extreme conspiracycruft, and patent nonsense. Danny Lilithborne 00:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not patent nonsense. Powers 01:52, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Speedily Author describes it as a listing!, it's not the yellow pages, come on! MichaelBillington 03:29, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - self-promotion. -- RHaworth 05:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh dear God, someone has mistaken Wikipedia for a webhost. Delete. --Calton | Talk 05:27, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.