Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Towing and Recovery Hall of Fame and Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The Bushranger One ping only 23:59, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

International Towing and Recovery Hall of Fame and Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No discernible notabilty from the article and no references or secondary reliable sources. Warfieldian (talk) 06:31, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication of notability - though might get a reference to the museum in Tow truck. Springnuts (talk) 08:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC) keep ivo sources available (though they are pretty much pot-boiler articles).Springnuts (talk) 23:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep After a quick search, I turned up these independent sources amongst all of the non-independent secondary sources. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. I think this museum is notable enough for Wikipedia.--NortyNort (Holla) 09:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply: The museum is already listed as a link in the Tow Truck article which seems adequate without a separate article. Warfieldian (talk) 13:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per NortyNort's sources. Significant coverage in reliable independent sources means the article passes notability per WP:N.  It's entitled to its own article whether or not it's also mentioned at Tow Truck.  Also the nominator should be aware of WP:BEFORE - prior to nominating for AfD due to notability concerns it's the nominator's responsibility to undertake searches themselves, which clearly hasn't happened here. - DustFormsWords (talk) 22:12, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Coverage in multiple reliable sources establishes notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.