Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Turnkey systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 09:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

International Turnkey systems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Under (G11) this page may qualify for deletion, as it seems very much like advertising. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager (talk) 22:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
 * By the way, I came across International Turnkey systems as I was testing Special:NewPagesFeed and that's why I'm logged in under my Wikimedia Foundation account, but I don't mean to imply that the WMF Officially Believes that this page ought to be deleted. Sorry for any such implications. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Engineering Community Manager (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Probable delete The refs generally aren't to independent and reliable sources: the Zawya article is a press release, and most refs are to Bobsguide, which may not be a reliable source - it seems to be a marketplace/sales network so its write-ups on companies in the network would not be independent. One ref was in Arabic which I don't read, and another's to a Gartner report which costs money but might be reliable, but based on what I could read I can't see evidence of notability. --Colapeninsula (talk) 02:31, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 08:40, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - Sources have been reedited and more are added. Bobsguide as a source won't be considered anymore in future edits AhmadTahaM (talk) 10:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC) — AhmadTahaM (talk)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep- has refs here and here. I presume them to be notable because if I can find these in English, I could only imagine the Arabic sources. PortlandOregon97217 (talk) 01:45, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 10:51, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.