Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Workshop on Dependable and Sustainable Peer-to-Peer Systems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:53, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

International Workshop on Dependable and Sustainable Peer-to-Peer Systems

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a workshop organised since 2006, and it does not seem to be notable (yet); the workshop seems to be too new to tell whether it has had significant impact in the field. There are the usual hits in search engines that you'll fine for any computer science conference or workshop (conference web pages, CfPs on various mailing lists, CVs of conference organisers, papers presented in the conference, etc.) but there doesn't seem to be any third-party sources. This is one of the few entries in List of computer science conferences for which I haven't been able to find any reliable sources that would show that this workshop is notable; for a typical notable conference it is reasonably easy to find several third-party references. I don't have any personal opinion about this workshop, and I'll be happy to change my mind if someone finds reliable sources. This is a contested prod; hence taking to AfD to get more discussion. Miym (talk) 23:12, 8 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —Miym (talk) 00:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this is too new to have attained the notability we need to have an article here. To the nominator's well-reasoned rationale I'd add that workshops tend to be lesser to conferences and symposia, and there's no evidence presented that this should be considered an exception. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not yet notable, and it would be crystal-balling to argue that it will be someday. Qworty (talk) 16:14, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.