Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International notational

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE. dbenbenn | talk 07:58, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) There were 4 votes to merge to Algebraic chess notation, and 3 to delete.

International notational

 * Delete. I don't understand the point of the article. It's not very coherent, and the title seems to be misspelled. Most of the contents are already covered elsewhere, e.g. in algebraic chess notation.--Sonjaaa 19:32, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable term. A Google search reveals that while chess enthusiasts sometimes write international notation, they may be referring to any of several chess notations, and use it purely as descriptive terminology GeorgeStepanek\talk  03:35, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Algebraic chess notation and redirect. -Rholton 05:10, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, merge/redirect sounds good. Samaritan 08:35, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect as above. Thryduulf 11:21, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable chesscruft. We wouldn't likely keep an article about the tiniest and most obscure elements of Final Fantasy or Scrabble, why be inconsistent for chess? Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  11:33, Jan 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Algebraic chess notation and add redirect. Megan1967 00:06, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.