Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International paleopsychology project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

International paleopsychology project

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

From the first 10-32 seconds of the Big Bang to the present? Say what? This sounds like a hoax. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  04:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is about psychology, it requires a mind, meaning atleast one neuron in an animal life form so the time period covered seems senseless. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment See also Articles for deletion/International Paleopsychology Project.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It does at least appear to be notable, there are a number of results yielded by a Google Books search.--Pontificalibus (talk) 09:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This project was founded by Howard Bloom whose article got deleted due to nonexistent sources. I searched for 25 scientific databases via University of Helsinki metasearch and found only one book "Bailey, Kent G., Human paleopsychology : applications to aggression and pathological processes, 1987" which has no references to Bloom. I found no publications by Bloom in the academic databases. The claim "Those members have included physicists, microbiologists, neurobiologists, evolutionary psychologists, paleobiologists, entomologists, invertebrate biologists, cognitive scientists, computer scientists, and mycologists." seems like a blatant lie. If it would be a credible field of study there would be publications available, not just some self published spiritual and conspiracy books. --piksi (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.