Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International rankings of Singapore


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 05:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

International rankings of Singapore

 * — (View AfD)

I fail to see how this is even remotely encyclopedic. This is just cruft. Unencyclopedic list which needs to be deleted imo. – Chacor 10:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of info. James086Talk 12:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. MER-C 12:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Ed (Edgar181) 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Same reason for having International rankings of the United States. This is a helper page for Singapore, which is too long to accommodate the information. The listed rankings kept seeping into Singapore, and User:Nichalp suggested relocating these information during a peer review. Rather than calling to delete, please suggest where to merge instead or how to expand to make it encyclopedic. Otherwise, many users will keep inserting these rankings back into the Singapore article, and we will have endless discussion which rankings to keep or remove. Thanks. --Vsion 18:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Apparently that page is a spinoff taken from the Singapore one. Because X exists doesn't mean Y has to exist. Indeed, the U.S. article should also be deleted. – Chacor 01:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Then please nominate International rankings of the United States for afd, as per your comment. --Vsion 07:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Articles for deletion/International rankings of the United States. There. – Chacor 07:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'd also say "delete" for International rankings of the United States if it were up for deletion nomination. Agent 86 19:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.