Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2006 North Korean nuclear test


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Relisted twice already to gain this consensus, non-admin closure. Shawn Is Here : Now in colors 10:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

International reactions to the 2006 North Korean nuclear test

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm horrified by this article, not because of any views that might be expressed over the nuclear test or the North Korean menace, but the fact that this article is a quotefarm of soundbites, indignant comments, empty rhetoric and "mee toos" from overly self-important politicians from countries with only remote connection to the actual test.  Ohconfucius  ping / poke 04:16, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 14.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  11:42, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up The article is well-sourced, and its layout is good; the only thing I have a problem with is the flag icons.  Mini  apolis  21:29, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaca  tion  9  00:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 00:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Its encyclopedic to record the official reactions of other nations to significant events like this.   D r e a m Focus  00:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.