Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International recognition of Meitei culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

International recognition of Meitei culture

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is basically a synthesis created for purposes of WP:Peacock. Pepper Beast   (talk)  02:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, India,  and Manipur. Skynxnex (talk) 04:00, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - not really seeing why this page is needed and why any important bits can't be added into the (many) other pages on Meitei culture. JMWt (talk) 09:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious WP:Peacock.RangersRus (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: There could be an article about the culture itself, but this isn't it. It's random bits of trivial pasted together. Oaktree b (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge (into Meitei culture): The article is cited with numerous sources for each paragraph, supporting all the claims. None of them are fake claims. Anyone can scrutinise it. There's no question of WP:NOTABILITY in this case. If anyone believes that the article is suffering from WP:PEACOCK (or the so called WP:PUFFERY), then he/she can rewrite the article to correct the problem or, if unsure how best to make a correction, the article may be tagged with an appropriate template, such as . Deletion isn't the solution in case of the rationale given for this AFD. There are numerous articles of similar type, such as International recognition of the Khojaly massacre, International recognition of the National Transitional Council, International recognition of the Syrian National Council, etc. accepted by the Wikipedia community. --Haoreima (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Are you claiming "Meitei culture" is a human rights atrocity, like the Khojaly massacre, where "recognition" has specific set of legal and political connotations and denotations? In that case, how many victims are there of Meitei culture?
 * Or are you claiming "Meitei culture" is a body which claims to be the legitimate ruling representative of a nation, as with the NTC and SNC, where "recognition" refers to diplomatic recognition, which carries a very specific set of legal and political connotations and denotations? Brusquedandelion (talk) 03:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Obvious WP:Peacocking. Brusquedandelion (talk) 03:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment Are there any precedents for this? Upon reading the title, I wondered if Meitei culture was perhaps not universally acknowledged as an independent culture, the way some Native American tribes aren't recognized by the United States government, and this article was about the debate. It seems it's not. Is there a "Recognition of Cheyenne/Uighur/Hakka culture" article? Darkfrog24 (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
 * There's no such precedent, and we should hastily delete this article before it creates such precedent.
 * The closest equivalent to the Native American analogy is that the Government of India did not officially recognize Meitei/Manipuri until the Seventy-first Amendment of the Constitution of India, when Meitei was added to the Eighth Schedule. India also has a system for "scheduling" so-called "tribes and castes," but this generally occurs at a level much more granular than ethnicity, broadly constructed, and is reserved for groups considered especially socio-economically disadvantaged.
 * From the perspective of Wikipedia, all this is already well-covered elsewhere: the articles linked above, and at Meitei language movement, inter alia. Furthermore, the actual content of the article under discussion, as it stands, does not even cover these issues, but rather consists largely of peacocking. Brusquedandelion (talk) 01:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per all. Okoslavia (talk) 12:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.