Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internationale Medienhilfe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  15:48, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Internationale Medienhilfe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Missing notability according to the notability criteria, this article obviously serves self promotional purpose. This organisation has done nothing notable and I cant see any of the criterias for notability fullfilled. Since it offers commercial oriented consulting and advertising services to small number newspapers (for this actions there is also no independent source given) and is a snall self publisher ( publishing only its own books) it is to be seen as a commercial organisation. No widespread medial coverage about it ( in the last 20 years around 20 journalistic articles where it gets mentioned but only menioned). There is no office, it is a mailbox organisation without an office and only run by the founder Björn Akstinat himself and according to his saying supported by 10 volunters somewhere in germany (for which there is also no independent source), from his own or parents home (this is where the address given by the IMH leads to), where from he runs also his second organsiation for german music. Also for the so-called members of the IMH workgroup there is no independent and reliable source given. The data this IMH gives as results of their research is the result of Björn Akstinat himself using Google how he himself admits in an interviev published at the 25/06/2014 in a blog. We had already the fun with the company spam of 60 sockpuppets around this organisation in the german wikipedia before the deletion of this article since of missing notability.

Is a private mailbox organisation which is run by one person from his own or his parents home with no independent medial coverage about its specific actions or work really notable for the Wikipedia. I doubt that. Seader (talk) 03:41, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly fails WP:CORP. CesareAngelotti (talk) 11:19, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 06:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Only reference is to its own web site. No evidence of notability. LaMona (talk) 22:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.