Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internaught


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 10:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Internaught
Neologism. Delete. - Mike Rosoft 09:55, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - A Google search gives few results, and most of them don't seem to be related to what's in the article. I'm not entirely sure but I think that the statement "and should not be allowed to participate in the Internet" might be considered POV. Bergsten 13:57, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

' Relisting to generate more discussion. Only 1 vote besides nominator's. ' Mo0 [ talk ] 18:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't really even verify the term is used in the context the article describes, it doesn't seem to be defined anywhere, not even Urban Dictionary. --W.marsh 18:43, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. Not verifiable anywhere. &laquo; Lord  ViD  &raquo; 18:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom Tom Harrison (talk) 19:22, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - complete bollocks. Internaut (for early Internet user) perhaps, but this is just a variant of AOLer. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 00:06, 18 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.