Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Haganah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mr.Z-man 23:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Internet Haganah

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This group is not notable, the article does not establish nor reliably source notability, in fact it is entirely unsourced CdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 00:19, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: unsourced. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The sourcing can be worked on but the group has recently been receiving press internationally because they were involved in preventing Al Qaeda from releasing a video they planned to distribute on 9/11. That story can be found here. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 14:50, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is weak and the organization is tiny, but they have reasonable press coverage in the Washington Post, Newsweek , and CNN . --John Nagle (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The founder was also very recently (in July) on 60 Minutes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsteindonut (talk • contribs) 01:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  18:19, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * sources are more about what happened than the group, more neededCdC—Chuleta de Chancho (talk) 07:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable, this "organization" seems to be one person sitting at his computer. Maybe this person himself has become notable, and maybe the entire subject of "private counter-terrorism operations on the Internet" should have an article (if it does not already.)  If it is kept, the article obviously needs to be sourced and NPOV'd, starting with the "direct quote from nowhere" in the first sentence of the article.  6SJ7 (talk) 16:13, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.