Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Relay Chat flood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn per Tothwolf's addition of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:41, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Internet Relay Chat flood

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Dictionary definition, entirely unsourced since creation ages ago. I can't possibly see a way for this ever to be sourced, even if the original research is cut. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:05, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, since this AfD was created the article has been well sourced, and it appears informative to me. Taelus (talk) 08:43, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep: Its obvious the nominator didn't bother to check for sources before nominating this article for AfD. Numerous sources for this subject are available and I've added 4 historical IRC documents, 3 IETF RFCs, and 21 books. I've also added an Expand template to the article because it could be significantly expanded from it's current form. Tothwolf (talk) 17:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.