Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Top 100 Games List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. @pple 04:30, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Internet Top 100 Games List

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This has been an article here for 3+ years, but still lacks 3rd party reliable sources showing that this web "survey" is notable. It was tagged speedy, but given that it has had a fair amount of editing it probably belongs at afd instead. Carlossuarez46 22:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable text file, no third party references, and the criticism controversy section is probably original thought. --Alksub 23:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability for this list Corpx 04:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keepwarpozio 12:21, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Update, Citing sources Rewrite as recent period of the page, and citing all following information: Reliable sources, method, ranges of net games, based of sales? downloads? how many people playing or played the game(s)...... Roded86400 15:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment All the sources cited come from the website that seems to be part of the subject of an article. Per WP:RS, we need independent sources to prove notability and verifiability. -- B figura  (talk) 20:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Very very weak keep, and delete if no half-decent sources are added by the end of this AfD. Italiavivi 19:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete still no reliable sources. But even if someone adds them, I don't see how we're going to meet WP:N. -- B figura (talk) 20:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
 *  Weak Delete - the list is reasonably well-known, but fame is not notability, and there are no reliable sources. -- Whpq 16:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - As of December 2005, 727 contributors have submitted 79,537 ratings. That does not sound like notability to me.  Sheffield Steel talkersstalkers 21:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.