Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet accuracy project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:56, 19 November 2005 (UTC)

Internet accuracy project
Not yet notable web project, although sounds like a good idea. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 00:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, though I hope it becomes notable enough to recreate. Maybe it could be added as an external link on some other page?  Indium 01:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete a good idea which has not yet made its mark. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 13:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I suspect that this is just the founder's notes put on the Web.  The second paragraph of the article is lifted whole from the FAQ . - Dalbury (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as an ad, basically, two-thirds of article was directly copied from site's FAQ page FRS 16:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. HGB 11:45, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep looks like a good article. Not really vanity or anything, and should be notable enough long term to warrant keeping. 203.122.218.47 16:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Then we add the article when the project becomes notable. -- howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 16:54, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect or mege. Maybe this reasoning is totally screwy/lame—but I might well never have learned of this intriguing website if there hadn't been a Wikipedia article on it and it hadn't been recommendation.  Then again, this little bit of info could be put into an article on organization or policing or control of the Internet.  President Lethe 21:56, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet to be notable. Good project though. *drew 12:31, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.