Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internews Europe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. WP:NPASR. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Internews Europe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

They certainly think thery're important, but I cnanot see that anyone else does, or at least has been willing to say so in sources we can rely on.,

Even if such could be found, so much of the article is so self-congratulatory that it really needs to be removed as promotional; there would be almost nothing left to use if a rewrite were attempted. WEe need to discourage this sort of article.

It was, like hundreds of its kind, accepted by AfC.  DGG ( talk ) 23:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, plenty of results in searches among secondary sources especially including Google Scholar. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern   Antarctica   ₵  03:21, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 08:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.