Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpersonal love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 15:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

Interpersonal love
I suppose the best established reason for deletion is that it's a dictionary definition. -- Kjkolb 08:22, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not necessarily a dictionary definition; its a stub. I could imagine a proper article with that title.  But THIS article is useless borderline gibberish. (Previous unsigned comment by Herostratus 12:15, 20 November 2005) 
 * Delete nonsense. Karol 11:15, 20 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per Herostratus. Anville 11:16, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. My eyes roll at the notion that anyone could need this definition.  Isn't the only alternative narcissism? Durova 11:39, 20 November 2005 (UTC) WP:BITE duly noted. Durova 18:25, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. IMHO, this doesn't add anything to "Love", which is usually interpersonal. Add to that that this is crap prose, and you've got a solid AfD. Nazgjunk - - Signing is for Whimps 14:18, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Feel free not to WP:BITE the newbies people. Kappa 17:52, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: actually, I left my nomination purposefully vague to avoid biting the newbies. -- Kjkolb 06:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete glad I saw your post, Kappa... I was about to at least nibble. (Durova, you are a fount of wisdom, but isn't there extrapersonal love also? You know, that guy who just bought his flashy sports car... Yea that's a neologism.) KillerChihuahua 22:41, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Giggle see testosterone poisoning. Durova 00:41, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: that we have an article about it is disturbing, I didn't know that term was used outside of the eunuch fetishist "people". -- Kjkolb 06:50, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete dic def. - Mgm|(talk) 09:15, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
 * delete --Ixfd64 09:07, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unexpandable dicdef, and not even a completely correct one at that. MCB 06:09, 24 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.