Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpersonal wellness


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A7 by Jimfbleak. (non-admin closure) &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 11:05, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Interpersonal wellness

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails Notability guideline  Veggies  ( talk ) 22:58, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Veggies. This is a neologism invented by the article's author.  I PROD'ed the article simultaneously with Veggie's AFD nomination; I think the deletion is non-controversial enough to not need an AFD.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 23:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I concur. Not much that hasn't already been said here.  Bagheera (talk) 23:33, 15 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: I did a Google Books search to determine if "interpersonal wellness" is used in any contexts independent of that described in the article. It appears that the concept has been discussed in a few WP:RS, especially in the The Praeger Handbook Of Education And Psychology, Volume 1, pg. 342..  The article as currently written clearly is not up to Wikipedia standards (e.g. WP:OR), but a completely re-written article with appropriate sources may have some WP:POTENTIAL. --Mike Agricola (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not clear that "interpersonal wellness" is anything more than a vague neologism; I don't see a compelling source that establishes this as a technical term with a set meaning. Worse, I found a source using this term from 1994, long before the origin claimed in the entry, and I can find no reliable source that mentions Joyce Odidison in connection with this term (for example, she is not mentioned in the Praeger Handbook reference given above). Hairhorn (talk) 04:18, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.