Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpretations of the scientific method

Interpretations of the scientific method was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE AND REDIRECT

This article covers the same ground as our current article on the Scientific method, only less well. I vote that it should be deleted. RK 15:35, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * The content isn't that bad (compared to most VfD things) but it's silly to have yet another article covering things which ought to be adequately covered in scientific method, Paul Feyerabend, and The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. I'm going to vote merge and cleanup on this one... what disturbs me the most is that there is in this article what can only be interpretted as a deliberate lack of links to the original scientific method article. ...As I read over it some more, a lot of the content is actually pretty poor.. I'd say merge a bit of it, delete the rest. --Fastfission 18:24, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge with scientific method and redirect. The page was created by User:Cimon Avaro last year and since then has had exactly one edit (minor); maybe someone can ask him where he was going with it. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:07, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
 * There are much worse articles on Wikipedia, and it addresses a subject which might be interesting to "religionists," "magical thinkers" and others who may distrust the scientific method for whatever reason. Merge, redirect, link, cleanup, whatever, but don't delete...Fire Star 13:53, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)