Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intersexphobia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 20:25, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Intersexphobia

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This appears to be a non-notable neologism. Google News reveals no evidence of the word in common use and Google Scholar yields one match to an MA dissertation where the word is used in a hyphenated form in the context of a quote (and so may be a misuse or a created word). Various websites can be found using the word but these results may be circular and not reliable sources. It should be noted that a number of sources are quoted in the current text which do not actually use this word, for example. Ash (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Intersexphobia is a word coined by intersexed activists such as those connected with Hermaphrodites with Attitude. Just as transphobia was new to language a few years back, so is intersexphobia. There is no reason to delete this article at all. Those in the intersexed community are well aware of it's usage and need a word to describe bigotry against those who are intersexed. Thank you. VeganAgainstHatred. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VeganAgainstHatred (talk • contribs) 18:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as Original Research. Polarpanda (talk) 13:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NEO, WP:OR. Also the article is aggressively non-neutral. Crafty (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect to Intersex as a plausible search term. This is just a POV rant at the moment, and the lack of reliable sources discussing the topic of hatred towards intersex people means we can't keep an article on the topic. Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  21:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to Intersex. Likely neologism so redirect is fine but the potential article is not anything like the WP:Soapboxy rant here. -- Banj e  b oi   20:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - a complete non-established neologism. The article itself is POV-laden in the extreme & utterly not worth a redirect, let alone saving - A l l i e  ❤ 22:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Soapbox.  Sławomir Biały  (talk) 00:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.