Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interstate 875

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 09:28, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Interstate 875
This was marked for speedy, but it's not a speedy candidate. There is no such thing as I-875 and it has never been planned for this area. This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete --SPUI (talk) 06:25, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not the place for speculation and suspicions. There is no such thing as I-875 - doesn't that mean it is patent nonsense and therefore a candidate for speedy deletion? -- RWH 06:52, 2005 Feb 17 (UTC)
 * It makes sense; it's just speculative original research. The idea has been proposed among roadgeeks but not officially. --SPUI (talk) 07:39, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Road articles are ok if done properly, but this one doesn't even exist. Trilobite (Talk) 10:58, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This could have been speedied as speculative nonsense AFAIC. older &ne; wiser 13:17, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just speculation. Zzyzx11 20:39, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Move to BJAODN. Ellsworth 23:34, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Jayjg (talk) 05:17, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)