Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interviewstreet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Interviewstreet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

was nominated for speedy a long time ago, and declined (by me!). On further review, I think the company probably does fail notability (corp) and so am nominating for afd. Gaijin42 (talk) 15:59, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:25, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete - Has two notable sources, but they are very brief mentions, essentially noting existence and little else. I'll invoke WP:CORPDEPTH here.  The depth of coverage is not substantial so it needs more to pass WP:ORG.CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 18:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, the sources are not substantive mentions. Ultimately WP:GNG and WP:CORP do not appear met. -- Kinu  t/c 22:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.