Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intiguttu (1984 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Warm Regards, ZI Jony  (Talk) 14:59, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Intiguttu (1984 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM. There is also a 1958 film with the same name which makes searching for sources more complicated. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  23:18, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

*Delete - based off searches for both names, I couldn't find any reviews with more than a couple of lines. It certainly seems as if NFILM isn't satisfied. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - A major Tollywood film by iconic director and actors. Finding online sources in another language and script from a film that came out before online existed is extremely challenging.  I don't believe for a second that there wasn't extensive print coverage when this film came out, either reviews or features in the Telugu language.  Of what I can find in English, the book History of Indian Cinema says this is a Filmfare Awards winner in the Best Actor category which demonstrates passing WP:NFILM, specifically WP:NFO - "The film has received a major award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking" as well as "The film features significant involvement (i.e., one of the most important roles in the making of the film) by a notable person and is a major part of his/her career."--Oakshade (talk) 03:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep-Per Oakshade, for Filmfare awards are damn significant.We ought be very careful when dealing with films from an era, whose coverage is near-zero in current-online-scape. &#x222F; WBG converse 09:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep If Oakshade's statement is correct then obviously criterion 3 of NFILM would be satisfied. Nosebagbear (talk) 10:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.