Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Into the Woods (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Into the Woods (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

They do not meet WP:NBAND or WP:GNG. Lack of reliable sources. Boleyn (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  04:02, 22 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Several article references are dead links. Searching found nothing useful to notability.  Fails WP:BAND and WP:GNG.  Happy to reconsider if better sources are located. Gab4gab (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:09, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete It's very hard to search for them: they share their name with a stage and film musical, releases by more famous bands, an unrelated Australian band, and their only album is eponymous; add to that the many musical things called The Woods or Woods. There is a risk when searching that Google will hide less notable results where a publication discusses more than one Into The Woods. Having said that, while Metal Hammer is a reliable source (despite recent woes), there doesn't seem to be any others. (Metal Music Archives seems to publish user-submitted stuff and the other links on the article are social media or ticket sales.) I will be happy to be proved wrong though. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.