Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intradeco Holdings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:26, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Intradeco Holdings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

SpaldingTac requests deletion of article but cannot seem to figure out how to properly tag the article for deletion. The reason given by SpaldingTac was: "not much information. I couldn't meet the requirements to fix the issues. note that I am the original user but I cannot delete the page. any questions please email me at " --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 14:39, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I will quote User:SpaldingTac from User:Piguy101's talk page: "I work for the company Intradeco and my boss told me he wanted the page deleted so I tried to delete it as the original user". There is obvious sign of COI editing in the article, and the references are either the company site, or dead or irrelevant (barring possibly the elsalvador one). Despite the boss wanting the page deleted - normally a challenge to me - I think it should go as not notable. The companies that sell their products may be notable, but who knows who makes them? Ever found out where BloggsCo source their tinned peas and beans from? Peridon (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: SpaldingTac may be the original author, but if so, it wasn't done with that account. There have been other SPA names involved as well. This is why I declined a G7. Peridon (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  01:21, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.