Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasio Barbarorvm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Invasio Barbarorvm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article was proposed for deletion, and I then deleted it after the period was ended. The author contacted me afterwards to contest the deletion, so I have undeleted the article and placed it on AfD as a routine process. No vote from me. J I P | Talk 20:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'll echo my reasons given in the prod: Non-notable game per WP:GNG: absolutely no reliable sources to establish notability. Sample search. Existence does not imply notability. tedder (talk) 20:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * D'oh, I forgot that. Sorry. J I P  | Talk 14:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and comment You were right to do what you did. The rules state that if nobody says anything and only the AfD nominator is left, then it will be deleted.  If the author wanted to contest deletion, he should have want through deletion review.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:49, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Game mod that has no coverage in reliable sources. My searches found the typical forum posts only. -- Whpq (talk) 17:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.