Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invasive weed optimization algorithm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Invasive weed optimization algorithm

 * — (View AfD)

A new algorithm, apparently unused by anyone, no followups listed. I believe this to be vanity, especially since the author of the article is apparently also the primary author of the only reference. In short, there is no sign this is of any relevance at all to computer science, and signs of self-promotion. --Gwern (contribs) 07:28 9 December 2006 (GMT) 07:28, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - 14 non-wiki ghits. Fails WP:V. MER-C 08:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. TSO1D 18:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Puff Puff Delete - When I saw the name, I thought it was something made up while high one day. :-p Still lacks any notability or verifiability, however. Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 20:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, it can be verified alright. Just check for the included reference. Problem is notability. --Gwern (contribs) 21:17 9 December 2006 (GMT)


 * Delete exists, yes, but non-notable. Now off for brownies, chips, cookies, cheese, donuts...  SkierRMH, 07:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete One essay, written five days ago, is not a reliable source. Wavy G 07:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No context, non-notable, possible original research. —ShadowHalo 05:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.