Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invention (industry)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:41, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Invention (industry)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be a PoV fork of Invention Wtshymanski (talk) 05:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Answer 1: See disambiguation for Invention: Invention (disambiguation)

Invention may refer to:

Invention (musical composition), a short composition (usually for a keyboard instrument) with two-part counterpoint
 * Invention, a form, a composition of matter, or a process that has an element of novelty
 * "Invention", a song by Pedro the Lion from the 1999 EP The Only Reason I Feel Secure
 * Invention (album), a collaboration by Phil Keaggy, Wes King, and Scott Dente
 * Invention (industry), an invention having a technical aspect and requiring more skill and ingenuity [italics by zutam]

Therefore: this article is compatible with the other articles on invention per WP policy, and is distinguished like the other articles in the disambiguation page.

Answer 2: After publication in WP, this article was copied to an external site (see discussion). If the article is removed from WP, it may create a mistaken impression in public, that it is copyright protected and originated by the external site mentioned by Coren_bot. Isn't this is akin to stealing something away from the public domain and unjustifiably claiming authorship? Shouldn't WP protect the publich by preventing this?

Answer 3: This contribution was deleted many times at WP - could it be possible that it is done by the same people at the external site which copied it from WP?

-Zutam (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Details of many deletions of this article - someone is terribly determined to hide/delete it:


 * I placed it as an addition to Invention. It was deleted several times, without any dialog or explanation
 * I created a new article Industrial invention. It was hid by redirect to Invention.
 * I now created this article; improved and with careful disambiguation vs. the other Invention varieties, just in the same format and as required per WP policy.

--Zutam (talk) 08:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Maybe an interested party got annoyed by the facts disclosed in this article, for example the USPTO initiative to accelerate the examination

"==New trends in patenting==
 * Accelerated examination [10] - since September 2006, USPTO offers..."

This venue is not well known in US. Some oppose it and don't cooperate with USPTO on this issue. I believe it is a worthy initiative, which can help reduce the patent applications backlog. The first to receive a patent under this program was a Japanese firm; to date (July 2010) there is no huge response from the public. The present article presents useful facts to the public, with this and other features.

--Zutam (talk) 12:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay, Original Research, PoV - take your pick. Peridon (talk) 21:47, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * PS If it's been deleted many times, perhaps there's a reason.... This is the first time I've seen it, so I'm not "someone ... terribly determined to hide/delete it". Peridon (talk) 21:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete POV fork, WP:OR, etc. Zutam created this because he couldn't get consensus for this content at Invention. - MrOllie (talk) 16:25, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment by nominator: Some of the contents belongs at Invention though not in point form. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.