Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inverse Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. S warm  ♠  04:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Inverse Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's general notability guidelines and WP:NORG. Social media and passing mentions in album released. No actual coverage of the company. J bh Talk  13:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  13:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  13:12, 3 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:CORPDEPTH. Note that most of the blue links in the list of bands are actually links to general concepts, not band articles. The few that are not are based typically on MySpace, Facebook, and maybe a single record review, giving little hope of finding good material for writing an article about the record label. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, clearly fails WP:CORPDEPTH and it is too soon for the page at this time. Ireneshih (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.