Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Investment Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep, without prejudice to any further discussion leading to a consensus to merge this information elsewhere. Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Investment Game

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to meet the notability guidelines. (Author contested prod.) OSbornarfcontribs. 19:55, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

 it is more of an event than a game.Tetron76 (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I think this would comfortably pass notability I did the most cursory of search not much on google news but several websites like:
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - No independent sourcing to show notability. The sources given by Tetron76, when translated, also look to be advertisements, press releases, and non independent. Yaksar (let's chat) 21:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I made my response quickly and added the first link from google news which as pointed out would fail notability requirements.

The second source I gave above comes from the official NASDAQ OMX Group as proven to be genuine from the link on. This sources might well be considered not independent but its size and legitimacy strongly suggest "presumed sources" in Baltic language newspapers.

Several other sources I found come from Stockholm School of Economics in Riga which is not independent but did win an award in part for this event but since the award came from NASDAQ OMX Baltic this is one big circle.

I think the following two sources are independent and count as RS to establish WP:GNG:


 * From The financial


 * The second I am not 100% sure about meeting the requirement is from balticbusinessnews.com by  Marge Tubalkain-Trell who has had  articles in the The Baltic Times

At worst this is a case of not just yetTetron76 (talk) 13:40, 13 April 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Chas (newspaper) has coverage at and if you want a translation
 * Certainly one of the most challenging, but very exciting activity is the investment game (Investment Game). Certainly one of the most challenging, but very exciting activity is the investment game (Investment Game). This kind of simulation of stock transactions, which takes place annually and collects a large number of participants from all over Latvia. This kind of simulation of stock transactions, which takes place annually and collects a large number of participants from all over Latvia. Main feature of this game is that it runs in real time, with shares of real companies (about 300 firms from the Baltic States, Russia, Finland and Sweden) and with no less than the real exchange rate, which is updated every 15 minutes. Main feature of this game is that it runs in real time, with shares of real companies (about 300 firms from the Baltic States, Russia, Finland and Sweden) and with no less than the real exchange rate, which is updated every 15 minutes. The only thing in this game is virtual, so it's money, ie, your 100,000 Euros, which you virtually buy their shares. The only thing in this game is virtual, so it's money, ie, your 100,000 Euros, which you virtually buy their shares. Imagine, what should the broker to make a profit, and you will understand the essence of the investment game. Imagine, what should the broker to make a profit, and you will understand the essence of the investment game. The game is as close to reality, and its purpose - to find the most successful "brokers" who will receive cash and prizes. The game is as close to reality, and its purpose - to find the most successful "brokers" who will receive cash and prizes. Plus everything you learn to follow the stock market, analyze the situation in companies, in general, all these things, without which it can hardly be a very good economist. Plus everything you learn to follow the stock market, analyze the situation in companies, in general, all these things, without which it can hardly be a very good economist.


 * It is unlikely that you have the opportunity to play this season since it opened on Nov. 10, but you have time to prepare for the next! It is unlikely that you have the opportunity to play this season since it opened on Nov. 10, but you have time to prepare for the next! Participation in the game is free for all. Participation in the game is free for all. And if you're in SSE Riga, then do not miss the annual party, dedicated to launch Investment Game! Now you understand how the Swedish raises these economists? And if you're in SSE Riga, then do not miss the annual party, dedicated to launch Investment Game! Now you understand how the Swedish raises these economists?


 * Notable coverage has been found.  D r e a m Focus  11:25, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep There are now sufficient reliable sources to keep this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge: to Stockholm School of Economics in Riga, per WP:MERGE criterion 'context'. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:14, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, although it would also be reasonable to merge the content as suggested above&mdash;editors can do that now or some time in the future. Cool Hand Luke 14:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.