Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Investment bankers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Investment banking, closed per snowball clause. G iggy\Talk 07:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Investment bankers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Concept is highly redundant to investment banking. Attempted redirect was reversed, so rather than edit war I'm bringing it here. Blueboy96 20:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect, of course. Article is of very low quality, there's probably little worthy of merging but the author should feel free to try. Eleland 20:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Redirect to Investment banking. If there is anything worth salvaging merge into the article. -- Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor  ( tαlk ) 23:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Userfy, merge anything useful into other articles (section by section) and Redirect. There is a lot of material there but it reads like an essay and would need a MASSIVE amount of copy editing to make it encyclopedic. I find it amusing that it refers to Chairman of the Federal Reserve as a copycat article. Dbromage  [Talk]  03:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. I'd like to point out that list of investment bankers, to which this redirected, seems to have been improperly deleted under CSD G7. Improperly, in that the request was from an IP number editor, who claimed to have written substantially all that article, when the edit history hardly supported that. This is a side-issue, naturally. But content in the area of investment banking is simply lost to the site by these deletions. There is no diff shown for the proposition that a redirect for this page; so I'd like to hear more about what is going on here. Charles Matthews 07:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.