Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Investomer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. But can be restored if the content is to be merged or reused as suggested here.  Sandstein  09:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Investomer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non-notable neologism. The current content isn't encyclopedic in nature either. Power~enwiki (talk) 03:23, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:20, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The article has a certain important (minor sure) in Finance and Investment.If you are not familiar with these subjects (nothing personal mate) then you should probably not Afd it.
 * I would not delete the article and rather wait until it is improved.
 * Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * delete per nom. Jytdog (talk) 22:27, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep or merge. While the article has a good bit of business jargon that could be simplified, the article itself seems referenced with multiple RS, showing the term exists. The idea of an investor also being a customer is of course popular and notable -- kickstarter campaigns, crowdfunding, etc. If it is just the title the nom has a problem with, renaming or a merge would be a better alternative then deletion. --Mark viking (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- a nn neologism. I could not locate sources that would be sufficient for an encyclopedia entry Gbooks preview; this does not appear to be a concept that's been covered by sufficient sources. The article reads like WP:ADVOCACY of some sort. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:36, 11 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.