Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Investor education


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Financial literacy. Courcelles 00:29, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Investor education

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominate for deletion Tagged for notability for over 5 years; couldn't confirm notability. Boleyn (talk) 21:10, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 12.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  21:29, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:ESSAY - Definetely original content. Doesn't belong here on Wikipedia. Vacation 9 22:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 05:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 03:40, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 04:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge to Financial literacy, since it seems to be a subset of that. Otherwise it is just two words with an obvious meaning. Investor education has got to be a good thing, but not really notable by itself. Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Effectively a WP:OR synthesis on the existence of a couple of studies, without independent evidence that they were notable in themselves, in any impact etc. Arguably, the content might be merged up into the (poorly referenced) articles on Canadian Securities Administrators and British Columbia Securities Commission but at risk of giving undue weight there. AllyD (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Financial literacy. There are good sources and content that fits in well there. I agree that this is not suitable for its own page but that does not justify deletion. WP:BEFORE is relevant. TerriersFan (talk) 02:06, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.