Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invincible error


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vincible and invincible ignorance. There is no consensus for a merge here either and none of those who voted to first delete the article and then redirect it have articulated any reason why the history of the article should be hidden. Salvio giuliano 19:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Invincible error

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The merge discussion here pertains which closed with "Participants provided compelling evidence that Invincible error should not exist as a standalone article, but there is not a clearly established consensus for either merging or deletion. AfD would be a very reasonable next step." The term "invincible error" is only found in very limited cases, and two months of discussion revealed just two sources, most notably in the Catholic Encyclopedia, but even in that volume it is not treated as a subject in itself, but is merely a type of error. The limited information in the stub more properly belongs in other articles. The discussion of Vincible and invincible ignorance is covered in an article already. Beyond that, this article has no substantive information, and does not meet WP:SIGCOV for such an article. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and Christianity. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete The fact of the existence of Vincible and invincible ignorance already renders this article invincibly redundant, IMHO. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as above, not a notable topic (and "Wikipedia is not a dictionary"). I'd also be ok with deleting followed by creating a redirect to Vincible and invincible ignorance on which this is a not specially clever play. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete & Redirect Un-cited—or mis-cited—more accurately. No hint of notability or standalone qualities.  GenQuest  "scribble" 16:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Vincible and invincible ignorance. The page history need not be deleted in this process. BD2412  T 00:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Vincible and invincible ignorance as that is a more comprehensive article and there is not enough coverage for this standalone article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.