Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invisible system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 01:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Invisible system

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Appears to be a non-notable musician per WP:BAND, WP:GNG and WP:BLP - lacks "significant coverage in reliable sources. BLP-PROD removed with single ref; article previously created by same user back in 2007, it still seems non-notable  Chzz  ► 22:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this band. Joe Chill (talk) 00:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup significantly. This article is currently overly promotional and imparts very little real information to the reader, but the subject does meet WP:GNG: the BBC, Guardian and Independent are significant, reliable sources. I42 (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment left some further links on my talk page, saying "I can't get my head around how to add links etc properly e.g. to reviews";
 * http://www.amazon.co.uk/Punt-Made-Ethiopia-Invisible-System/dp/B0020H473M/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1276121027&sr=8-1
 * http://hangout.altsounds.com/reviews/112099-invisible-system-punt-album.html
 * http://www.frootsmag.com/content/features/reviews_index/revs_ind_i.html
 * http://www.flyglobalmusic.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=1&Template=Fly&search=invisible+system+ethiopia
 * http://www.welt-musik.net/?p=3153
 *  Chzz  ► 22:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Article has a lot of notable sources, it just needs to use them. — Parent5446 ☯ ([ msg] email) 01:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.