Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invisibleshield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  Dei zio  talk 22:38, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Invisibleshield
Prod removed by IP w/no comment. Reads like spam, and I don't see how it can be improved - it's about one company's screen protector. Jamoche 23:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

What does that mean, "Prod removed by IP w/no comment?" Also, what do you mean by spam? Do you mean that it sounds like advertising? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.41.250 (talk • contribs)


 * Comment The first comment means that the IP (you) removed the prod without leaving any comment about why. The second comment means the article is advertising spam with no signs of notability or verification as to why this would deserve an encyclopedia article. IrishGuy 00:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. IrishGuy 00:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam, probably non-notable, reads copyvioish. -- E ivindt@c 00:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I thought it might be a candidate for db-copyvio, but there weren't any matches. --Jamoche 02:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above. --Strothra 00:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment OK, so I think it's pretty obvious I'm new around here, and I want to help build a useful, non-biased resource, so please help me out here. I've been searching Wikipedia and there are many entries on specific products that explain the features/benefits of those products.  How do I go about doing this in regards to the invisibleSHIELD without making it sound like spam?  I truly believe in the concept and power of Wikipedia and am excited about this new discovery - I want to be a worthwhile contributor! (as for deleting the Prod, it said we could do that after editing the content, so that's what I did.  I apologize for not knowing I had to leave a comment every time).  --user: otis_pjc 08:42, 17 May 2006


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.