Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invoicera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Minimal participation since Cunard's improvements, and I'm not gonna relist a fourth time. I won't object to somebody opening up a fresh discussion on this article in the near future. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Invoicera

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly sourced article with promotional tone with no third party references!!


 * Comment - I completed the nom for IP 121.244.131.238. ansh 666 23:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  lavender |(formerly HMSSolent )| lambast  01:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - Cleaned out all the promo text and added some possible references. Don't see the product passing notability, unless some more suitable refs are found.  -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 21:02, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete and draft/userfy instead - I say this because I acknowledge the sources but they are not even close for significant notability and further emphasized by my searches as the best thing there were the News links shown above and some press releases. SwisterTwister   talk  22:04, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.      </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Invoicera to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 05:48, 17 July 2015 (UTC) </li></ul> <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:38, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing app of no note. Govindaharihari (talk)
 * Your "delete" rationale, a "just not notable" vote, is not supported by Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 04:15, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 20:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Weak Delete/Userfy: could be speedy deleted for unambiguous advertising: "Spend time making money, not chasing money!", and/or copyright violation, article is taken straight from here and a few other spots on their website. Vrac (talk) 23:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC) Coverage still pretty thin for WP:CORPDEPTH. Vrac (talk) 04:00, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , I have rewritten the article. The original version by was neutrally written; the insertion of spam and copyright violations can be traced to these edits by  in May 2015. Cunard (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , WP:CORPDEPTH says: "The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability." I've cited multiple independent sources here to establish notability since the Entrepreneur and The Huffington Post articles include Invoicera in lists. But I think the CNET article and BestTechie are fairly substantial coverage. Would you clarify why you think Invoicera does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH and Notability? Cunard (talk) 04:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S warm   we ♥ our hive  07:33, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.