Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioannis Kakadiaris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep  Nomination was withdrawn by nominator.

Ioannis Kakadiaris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no sources other than some external links at the end. Article is an orphan. Subject does not appear to meet Notability guidelines. I did a quick check for references that could be added (Google'd his name) and didn't see anything that struck me as particularly useful. Zell Faze (talk) 15:14, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Withdrawn by nominator: It appears that I just didn't know what I was looking for in trying to determine this man's notability. Thank you everyone for clearing things up a little bit. Now we just need to get some inline citations into that article and get it de-orphaned so others won't make the same mistake going forward. :D Zell Faze (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:ACADEMIC#1, see his GScholar profile. --Randykitty (talk) 16:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As well as #C1, his named chair gives him a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:49, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:01, 3 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Snow Keep. Named chair and huge citations – conclusively passes at least 2 components of WP:PROF. Would be good form for the nom to withdraw this one, as its disposition is certain. Agricola44 (talk) 16:10, 4 March 2014 (UTC).
 * Withdrawn That seems fine by me. It seems obvious here that I just didn't know what to look for. Zell Faze (talk) 16:55, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.