Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Vîlcu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 23:09, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Ion Vîlcu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article reads like a CV and has only one source: a piece of news from the time when he was being interviewed by the Parliament committee before his appointment. Per WP:DIPLOMAT, ambassadors are not inherently notable. - Andrei (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep. Apart from his senior diplomatic posts, his high honours from two foreign countries as well as his own clearly give him notability per WP:ANYBIO #1. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: No opinion on notability at this point. Just noting that this entry seems to be a direct translation from here and may need to be paraphrased if kept. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:47, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 01:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Ambassador to 4 different countries. Clearly a very senior and notable official. DGG ( talk ) 08:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.