Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ionfone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   00:27, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Ionfone
Not notable. --Alex S 00:02, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified neologism. is this "technique" even practical ? Bwithh 01:22, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism. —Centrx→talk &bull; 01:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * DelET per nom. --Arnzy (whats up?)  01:28, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:NEO. --Coredesat 01:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete 25 June 2006 04:02 Ste4k wrote:unverifiable.
 * Delete per above. Jammo (SM247) 05:24, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism Nuttah68 08:54, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Not even a transwiki to Wiktionary candidate. ~Chris | e@  | wp:iar | wp:beans | m:dbad 09:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. --Kristjan Wager 15:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:NEO. Anand(talk) 18:59, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.