Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ionic Composite Lodge No. 520


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Ionic Composite Lodge No. 520

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Individual Masonic lodges, just like the local groups of other large  organizations, are not notable. The refs are trivial. I would have listed it for speedy A7, but it's a declined prod.  DGG ( talk ) 17:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. The article includes a section on the building shared by this lodge and others, the "Ionic Masonic Center" (as it is labelled on the building, seen in photo).  The article has an NRHP infobox (it should have a more generic building infobox instead), but the building was built in 1850 apparently and at any rate it is not listed.  The building can be mentioned in List of Masonic buildings in the United States;  i will try to add something there now. -- do  ncr  am  18:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * According to the article, the building was built in 1950 (not 1850). So it isn't as if it were especially old.  More importantly, since the building isn't on any historical register (such as the NRHP), then it does not meet the inclusion requirements for that list. I have removed it.  Blueboar (talk) 18:59, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I added/merged material about the building to List of Masonic buildings in the United States, where it is listed as "Ionic Masonic Center".  This article about one of the Masonic groups which meets there is not needed. -- do  ncr  am  18:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:ORG. Non-notable local chapter of notable parent org.  Does not seem as if the building is particularly notable either.  Blueboar (talk) 19:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.