Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipazke Julith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 16:26, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Ipazke Julith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find reliable third-party references which provide in-depth coverage of this leading hypnotherapist and psychiatrist. j⚛e deckertalk 16:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Nor have I found any. The article makes claims which saved it from a CSD A7, but they are unreferenced and apparently unverifiable to WP:RS. AllyD (talk) 16:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources whatever, and none found using Gnews link. Strangely, Gscholar has chosen not to index this renowned scholar. Ray  Talk 16:08, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. If this isn't a hoax, it's completely unverifiable through reliable sources. Webs.com as a reference? My searches only found a profile at Linkedin. • Gene93k (talk) 16:28, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any (reliable) sources through all known mediums. Certainly not notable enough. Endofskull (talk) 18:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. According to her website, she graduated from the "University of Standford", obtained a "PhD on Psychiatry" and is "writing a new expected to be an award winning paper for APA and the Psychology Insitituions". Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment as nom The use of stock photos (note ) on the twitter and webs accounts adds additional support for this as a hoax, although I'm starting to think it's pretty obvious. "University of Standford", LOL. --[[User:Joe Decker|j⚛e decker]talk 06:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: Insufficient evidence of notability and unable to verify information by reliable sources. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:48, 3 April 2013 (UTC))
 * Delete this really looks like a hoax. There is a slight, but unlikely possibility that this is a pseudonym, but there is no realiable sources for the claims in the article.  It is also unclear that even if the claims were true that the person would pass notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Nonsensical, a clear hoax. Did you check out the person's supposed website? It says "Welcome to my website, I am a renowned psychologist (well, that settles it; we have her own word for it that she's notable!) working on hypnosis and psychiatric therapy at Mui Corporation {which somehow never heard of her ) . I have writtent (sic) many papers on research in this fielf (sic) and I hope you find my site both informative and enjoyable, please have fun looking around! You can book my services in the Tickets and Reservations!" Not to mention the comment/endorsement from "Doc Tor Pakunwanichphd". Not written on April 1, but should have been. --MelanieN (talk) 01:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * P.S. I suppose it would be redundant to point out that Google Scholar never heard of her either. --MelanieN (talk) 23:48, 7 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete For the same reasons identified above. Kabirat (talk) 08:09, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.