Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iphone 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:18, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Iphone 5

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:CRYSTAL WP:SPECULATION. Baseball  Watcher  22:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Note: The IPhone 5 article is fully protected. Baseball  Watcher  22:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Info: The article has been moved from Iphone 5 to iPhone 5, obeying a request in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=430458993#Uncontroversial_requests to move Iphone 5 to iPhone 5 . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 12:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Apple have said nothing. All we have is a lot of speculation and rumour. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I might also add (using a crystal ball myself) that I bet we'll also have to salt it before we have enough info to create an article if and when any iPhone 5 is actually announced. Just a bit of precognition on my part. --  At am a  頭 22:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Never mind, I guess technically it is salted already. --  At am a  頭 22:44, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete "History: There is some talk about the iPhone 5. But nothing is certain, yet." Away it goes. --  T H F S W  (T · C · E) 17:51, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * keep Planning for notable projects which get wide public notice in notable publications is notable. This is not speculative. I recall similar discussions with other Apple projects, and this seems to me an example of hiding our collective head in the sand.  DGG ( talk ) 20:28, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt until there is more reliable, third-party coverage on this upcoming, unconfirmed product. Logan Talk Contributions 23:30, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Redundant, unsourced, and speculative. Sorry. Finalius  ( Say what? ) 00:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong keep I was going to wait until I had a stronger case but I see someone found a way around the barrier. I copy-pasted my draftspace which outlines just a few of the major rumors. The rumors could go on for pages and pages but I was a little busy with Military History project stuff these past few weeks. P.S. Chrystal ball doesn't apply to rumors published by outside sources so don't mention it. I checked with the architect behind the proposal and he/she says it definitely doesn't apply. Marcus   Qwertyus   01:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to the iPhone article. It's just a compilation of various rumours that have been reported as rumours. 65.95.13.213 (talk) 02:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Info: The article has been moved from Iphone 5 to iPhone 5, obeying a request in http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&oldid=430458993#Uncontroversial_requests to move Iphone 5 to iPhone 5 . Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. My understanding of the relevant policies is that a subject rife with rumor and innuendo may be eligible for an article if the rumors and innuendo are all propogated by reliable sources. This appears to be the case in this instance. -- Pink Bull  21:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.