Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iphone app after-life


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that the sources found do not establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Iphone app after-life

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. Iphone app with no claim to notability. I found a passing mention of the app in a blog but no reliable sources at all. bonadea contributions talk 19:01, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

This App is noteable. There is no other product like this avaliable. It is a digital will it has been mentioned in several places on the internet. Please google properly. A press release has been submitted about this app to the major news networks. Do not make a fool of wiki by deleting something you know nothing about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrBloggyDP (talk • contribs) 19:41, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment If the app is notable (that is to say, it has been given significant coverage in multiple reliable, secondary sources), please help Wikipedia by providing these sources. Press releases about a product are not reliable sources. Thank you! --bonadea contributions talk 19:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

So are you saying that, Apple, is not a reliable source? That fact that it is included in the app store & the andriod market place. Also reviewed here at PC World (A reliable source) http://www.pcworld.com/appguide/app.html?id=924532&expand=false also a review here http://thetopapppreviews.com/after-life/ not to mention the andriod market place and videos. You seem like your mind is already made up, so just do what ever makes you feel powerful Gene93k, sad! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrBloggyDP (talk • contribs) 20:04, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The pcworld source is a press release from the company, it is not a review. Press releases are not considered reliable sources. The thetopapppreviews mention is a review, but it is very short, the reliability of the source is unclear, and by itself it does not constitute "significant coverage in multiple reliable sources". Please take a moment to review these policies: notability, verifiability and reliable sources, as well as What Wikipedia is Not. It may save some frustration if you know how those terms are used on Wikipedia.
 * Finally, please refrain from assuming that other people have sinister motives. Comment on contributions and not on contributors. Personal attacks on other editors are strictly forbidden. We are all here to try and improve Wikipedia, after all. (Oh, and Gene93k is completely innocent - they only made a routine housekeeping edit to the page.) Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 20:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails to meet WP:N. Where the product is being sold is not a source and there is not significant enough coverage on the app to prove notability. AntiCommons (talk) 23:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep on Wiki This app is now included in Apple iTunes in the What's Hot section in Australian iTunes. This is now noteable — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrBloggyDP (talk • contribs) 09:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Being sold on itunes does not constitutre notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:56, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage in independent, reliable sources which are needed to support notability, just as WP:N requires. Some current sources are iTunes and Android Marketplace, both which verify that the software exists.  Being on the "What's hot" list in Australia is nice, but it provides no in-depth coverage of the app.  YouTube is user-submitted content and is therefore, not sufficiently independent. I, Jethrobot drop me a line 17:59, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.