Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Copyvio. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 20:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Ipma

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article should be deleted as it is not notable per the WP:GNG. This is because it has no sources currently and a WP:BEFORE search only found the subject's official website( not independent) or trivial mentions. This means the article at this time can't meet the WP:GNG and should be deleted. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 13:57, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note to admins User:KAP03 and User:Mahveotm created deletion discussions for this article at similar times and delete the second nomination. -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 14:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.