Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipsilateral monoparesis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was rediect to Paresis. Michig (talk) 07:34, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Ipsilateral monoparesis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ipsilateral monoparesis is not a major concept in neurology - it simply means weakness in one limb. There's also contralateral monoparesis, but that doesn't mean we need another article on that. The definition given in the article is wrong, it does not necessarily mean a spinal cord lesion. I would delete this page, and if someone was interested they can look up the definition of "ipsilateral" and the definition of "monoparesis." Further discussion of etiology and other related topics can go on the monoplegia page. Gccwang (talk) 20:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 07:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete. Ipsilateral monoparesis is mentioned in passing in some textbooks, but as a syndrome in itself, it lacks coverage in suitable secondary sources. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  20:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Paresis, where monoparesis is mentioned. The textbook ref in the article looks like a reliable one, but there doesn't seem to be enough coverage in secondary RS to satisfy notability. Nonetheless the term seems to be used in RS like the textbook cited, so a redirect is reasonable. monoplegia would be OK except that it is an unreferenced stub; paresis has a couple of refs and is in marginally better shape. --Mark viking (talk) 20:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Paresis agree Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 08:30, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Paresis, where monoparesis is mentioned. Jytdog (talk) 03:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.