Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ipsupermarket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Ipsupermarket

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertisement page for a non-notable business: no references were found in a Google News, Books, and Scholar search Gonzonoir (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Article was previously nominated for speedy deletion and prod; an IP removed the speedy and the creator removed the prod with a misleading edit summary and no rationale. Gonzonoir (talk) 12:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should really have been a speedy delete per G11 (Blatant advertising).  Everything Gonzonoir wrote is accurate.  In fact, any mention I can find on the web is advertising. &mdash; Mrand  Talk • C 14:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete blatant advertising page of non notable business Lets  drink Tea 01:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:SPAM --Artene50 (talk) 06:16, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as spam. --Ged UK (talk) 11:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.